|
General |
By Branch/Doctrine |
By Historical Period |
By Movement/School |
By Individual Philosopher |
![]() |
|
A huge subject broken down into manageable chunks |
|
Random Quote of the Day:
|
|
By Branch / Doctrine > Epistemology > Constructivism |
||||||
Constructivism (also known as Constructionism) is a relatively recent perspective in Epistemology that views all of our knowledge as "constructed" in that it is contingent on convention, human perception and social experience. Therefore, our knowledge does not necessarily reflect any external or "transcendent" realities. It is considered by its proponents to be an alternative to classical Rationalism and Empiricism. The constructivist point of view is both pragmatic and relativistic in nature. It opposes Positivism and Scientism in that it maintains that scientific knowledge is constructed by scientists, and not discovered from the world through strict scientific method, and it holds that there is no single valid methodology, and that other methodologies may be more appropriate for social science. The common thread between all forms of Constructivism is that they do not focus on an ontological reality ("reality-as-it-is-in-itself", which constructivists regard as is utterly incoherent and unverifiable), but instead on constructed reality. Thus, they reject out of hand any claims to universalism, realism or objective truth, and admit that their position is merely a view, a more or less coherent way of understanding things that has thus far worked for them as a model of the world.
Although the roots of Constructivism can be traced back to the Greek philosophers Heraclitus, Protagoras and Aristotle, it was only in 1934 that the French philosopher Gaston Bachelard (1884 - 1962) claimed that "Nothing proceeds from itself. Nothing is given. All is constructed", and only in 1967 that Jean Piaget (1896 - 1980) first used the expression "constructivist epistemology". The doctrine is indebted to late 19th Century Darwinian theory, as it is claimed by constructivists that human understanding, as the product of Natural Selection, can be said to provide no more "true" understanding of the world as it is in itself than is absolutely necessary for human survival.
|
||||||
|
General | By Branch/Doctrine | By Historical Period | By Movement/School | By Individual Philosopher |